<< /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /Pg 13 0 R 192 0 obj /P 9 0 R endobj ********************************* 1. endobj >> /Pg 14 0 R /K [14] /S /P endobj /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 479 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /Span endobj /P 625 0 R /P 619 0 R << 180 0 obj 229 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem 331 0 obj /Pg 14 0 R /P 9 0 R 428 0 obj >> << endobj >> /S /P /P 650 0 R /Footer /Sect endobj /Pg 14 0 R << << 238 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R >> /P 34 0 R << 61.16. /S /Span /S /P << >> /ActualText ( ) Here, where literally no discovery has . >> /Pg 13 0 R >> /K [445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R] /P 9 0 R /ActualText ( ) /Pg 30 0 R /Type /StructElem 333 0 obj /S /Span /Type /Catalog >> /Type /StructElem << endobj >> >> /K [18] /S /P /S /P /P 9 0 R 319 0 obj 316 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R endobj << << /Type /StructElem 374 0 obj endobj /K [1] 280 0 obj 195 0 obj /P 687 0 R freeweeklylegalnewsletter.gr8.com/ DISCLAIMER: Please note that the author of this blog post, Stan Burman is NOT an attorney and as such is unable to provide any specific legal advice. endobj /K [6] /P 191 0 R /K [0] /K 16 << 255 0 obj endobj /S /P /S /H2 /P 607 0 R >> /Contents [587 0 R 588 0 R 589 0 R] /K [251 0 R 252 0 R 253 0 R] >> >> /Pg 13 0 R endobj /Pg 27 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 10 /S /H1 393 0 obj endobj /ActualText (672) >> << << /S /Span endobj 22 0 obj >> endobj << /K [0] /K [21] << Sample Opposition To Motion For Attorney Fees in California - Scribd /K [473 0 R 474 0 R] /S /P /P 323 0 R 323 0 obj endobj /Pg 30 0 R /P 598 0 R >> endobj /P 9 0 R << endobj >> /Type /StructElem 156 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R /Resources 544 0 R << << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj >> 308 0 obj endobj /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj >> endobj << /Pg 30 0 R /P 235 0 R Publg Co., 526 F.Supp. endobj /S /Span 73 0 obj 50 0 obj >> 155 0 obj Proc., 425.16 (c) ("a prevailing defendant on [an anti-SLAPP motion] shall be entitled to recover his or her attorney's fees and costs."); Cal. /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 13 0 R PDF THURMAN W. ARNOLD, III, SBN: 107101 Certified Family Law Specialist 225 endobj 337 0 obj /S /P 216 0 obj /K [643 0 R 308 0 R] << /P 603 0 R endobj /Pg 21 0 R >> /Pg 24 0 R >> 291 0 obj /K [31] >> 303 0 obj /K [27] See, e.g., Henson v. Columbus Bank & Tr. 199 0 obj /Type /StructElem /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> endobj /Type /StructElem endobj >> /S /Table /Contents [557 0 R 558 0 R 559 0 R] 242 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem /K 8 >> 13 0 obj /S /Span 231 0 obj << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Parent 6 0 R << /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R << << /S /Span /Type /StructElem >> /Pg 30 0 R 282 0 obj endobj >> /Type /StructElem 123 0 obj << /S /Span /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem /P 632 0 R 160 0 obj >> 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R] << /K [58] /Type /StructElem << >> >> >> << /Pg 31 0 R >> /Pg 19 0 R 133 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 15 0 R /K [9] /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R They are currently arriving within 30 minutes of purchase. /K [63] /P 9 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 195 0 R 1986); Blowers v. Lawyers Coop. /Type /StructElem /Rotate 0 << >> endobj /S /P >> >> endobj /Footnote /Note The trial court has the discretion to determine the number of hours that the attorney reasonably expended. /Pg 16 0 R /S /P >> /K 4 << /Pg 30 0 R >> /Group 530 0 R /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /S /Span << /K [9 0 R] /K [25] /K [1] /K [2] /K [7] /P 194 0 R /P 632 0 R << >> /P 9 0 R /P 237 0 R >> /S /Span 7 0 obj 473 0 obj endobj << /S /Link endobj << endobj << >> 460 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R /S /Span /S /Span /Annots [] 9*R^+9Ni -Q\Is?5GuyI+9JM69umE|U.:g|M~8>%IHl38ZH5eh*R2MdXa#b/ /S /P 248 0 obj 1985); Costa v. Sears Home Improvement Prods., Inc., 178 F.Supp. endobj /S /Transparency 472 0 obj /S /Link >> The most recent case to so hold is In re Natl Lloyds Ins. /StructParents 29 /S /P >> /P 597 0 R endobj 321 0 obj ~6W[!!$)J+A:LS p!/o=$E^"S|NLFZ8L@9d^W?}-TUGpx-7DEjZ?pI3cqw vZN]U#NWw3>R4`$4)9?vS5;s$#%V]S?r5Lcgs^91@. /K [30] /Pg 31 0 R /P 189 0 R /P 232 0 R /S /P << >> Id. /Type /StructElem /K [1] P. 425.16. %PDF-1.7 /S /P /Contents [516 0 R 517 0 R 518 0 R] /S /H2 /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << /K [15] 201 0 obj /K [12] /S /P HTj@}Wfg/Zm1[[Dr !6Iv_$v"JWMC7vEP]/W0R /Pg 32 0 R << /K [45] 267 0 obj endobj /Pg 14 0 R /S /Span /S /Span /K [4] >> /S /P /Rotate 0 118 0 obj endobj /Pg 31 0 R /Group 561 0 R /Annots [550 0 R] 0000001736 00000 n /S /P endobj /Contents [577 0 R 578 0 R 579 0 R] /ITXT (2.1.7) 164 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Annots [] /S /Span 34 [180 0 R 351 0 R 352 0 R 353 0 R 354 0 R 355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R 358 0 R 359 0 R /Pg 24 0 R /Pg 13 0 R Co., 770 F.2d 1566, 1574-75 (11th Cir. /Resources 555 0 R 190 0 obj /K [39] 19 [116 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 333 0 R 334 0 R 335 0 R 336 0 R 337 0 R endobj 133 0 R 134 0 R 135 0 R 136 0 R 137 0 R 138 0 R 139 0 R 140 0 R 141 0 R 142 0 R endobj /Length 705 0 R /P 236 0 R /P 193 0 R endobj /S /Span << << 421 0 obj << /Contents [582 0 R 583 0 R 584 0 R] >> 97 0 obj /P 660 0 R >> /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem 30 [155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R] 340 0 obj 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R] >> 467 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R 471 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem endobj << /Type /StructElem /S /Span /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Resources 580 0 R endobj /K [0] /K [6] /Pg 31 0 R The download manager is not working as well as usual. >> /S /Span endobj 25 [132 0 R 133 0 R 134 0 R 135 0 R] /S /H1 >> endobj /P 9 0 R stream /P 606 0 R /Type /StructElem 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R /P 195 0 R << /K [43] /K 2 << 345 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [2] /Type /StructElem >> >> endobj /Type /StructElem /S /Footnote >> << /Group 581 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /S /Span /P 690 0 R endobj >> /S /Span 471 0 R 472 0 R 473 0 R 474 0 R 240 0 R 241 0 R 242 0 R] endobj Defendants' request for more than $280,000 in attorneys' fees and $160,000 in statutory penalties is as excessive as it is unfounded. << >> 352 0 obj 383 0 obj >> /Rotate 0 /Pg 30 0 R Absent a fee-shifting claim, a partys attorney-fee expenditures need not be reasonable or necessary for the particular case. >> 221 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R /P 611 0 R /K [36] >> << /K [26] /Pg 31 0 R Attorneys or parties in California that would like to view a portion of a sample opposition to a motion for attorney fees in California containing brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proof of service sold by the author can use the link shown below. /S /P 26 [136 0 R 137 0 R 138 0 R 139 0 R 140 0 R] /S /P /K [16] endobj << /K [8] /P 40 0 R /K [1] /K [15] 17 0 obj << << /K [4] >> /Type /StructElem 244 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 15 0 R << endobj /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R >> Barring unusual circumstances, allowing discovery of such information would spawn unnecessary case-within-a-case litigation devoted to determining the reasonableness and necessity of attorney-fee expenditures that are not at issue in the litigation. >> endobj 19 0 obj 166 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> /K 22 >> /Type /StructElem report form. >> /Type /StructElem /S /P >> << 8 0 obj << /K [5] /K [39] 439 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R endobj endobj 346 0 obj /Tabs /S /Pg 18 0 R A minority of courts go the other way, holding that what an objecting party paid in attorney fees to defend a case is not relevant on the issue of whether what the plaintiff paid to prosecute the case is reasonable. >> /P 692 0 R /Pg 31 0 R /K 6 /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 27 0 R Follow the author on Twitter at: https://twitter.com/LegalDocsPro Subscribe to his weekly newsletter with legal tips and tricks. /Pg 29 0 R 344 0 obj endobj 0000000945 00000 n /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /Endnote /Note /K [47] /K [28] Navigating the Pitfalls of a Motion to Enforce a Settlement Under CCP endobj >> >> 70 0 obj << /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 634 0 R 328 0 obj << 203 0 obj /P 9 0 R REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES. /S /Span 3d 108, 113 (W.D.N.Y. 466 0 obj /P 238 0 R /P 192 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K [4] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /Type /StructElem 26 0 obj 113 0 obj<>stream Co. v. Sealy Inc., 776 F.2d 646, 659-60 (7th Cir. /Pg 30 0 R 214 0 obj >> /K [17] << /S /Span 361 0 obj >> /K [459 0 R 460 0 R 461 0 R 462 0 R 463 0 R 464 0 R 465 0 R] /K [3] endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] PDF Instructions for Opposing a Motion Form As Your Affidavit or >> /K [29] endobj /S /P >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] attorney fees, "unless the court feels that opposition to the motion was substantially justified" or otherwise excused. /Pg 17 0 R 34 0 obj /Resources 524 0 R /P 607 0 R endobj /Rotate 0 /S /P >> /Type /StructElem /S /Span /Pg 13 0 R endobj >> /ActualText ( ) /K [0] 94 0 obj endobj endobj /P 9 0 R /P 38 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /S /P /Pg 32 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /K [4] 178 0 obj /Tabs /S /Type /StructElem endobj /K [6] Sample Opposition to Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees in California, This sample opposition to a motion for an award of attorney's fees in California is used to oppose a motion for attorney's fees after a judgment has been entered on several grounds including, 100% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful, 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful, Save Sample Opposition to Motion for Award of Attorney' For Later, _upmrcnr Onurt nl tbm _t`tm nl O`kclnrgc`, NUUN_CTCNG TN HNTCNG LNZ @Y@ZD NL @TTNZGMS_ LMM_, "m surm tn rmhnvm tbcs gntcom `gd `kk ntbmr gntcoms jm#nrm, bmrmcg sujhcts cts nppnsctcng tn tbm hntcng lnr `g `w`rd, ZMM*TM LMM* %ZM M5(M**)0M: T+M &T)$ L%)K* T !Z0)M *LL)()M$T, )$LZ&%T)$ ZM,%Z)$, T+M $%TZM %$ 0%KM L T+M *MZ0)(M*, )*(ZMT)$ T M$' T+M &T)$ LZ %TTZ$M' LMM* !Z*%$T T (M, `utbnrctcms, tbm dmok`r`tcng nl ^^^^^^^^^^^`gd mxbcjcts `tt`obmd tbmrmtn, ng tbm onhpkmtm lckms `gd, rmonrds nl tbcs `otcng, `gd ng suob ntbmr nr`k `gd/nr dnouhmgt`ry mvcdmgom `s h`y jm prmsmgtmd `t tbm, D`tmd^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^, sctu`tcng. /S /Span /Type /StructElem >> << << /S /Footnote /S /P /Pg 19 0 R >> The parties, through counsel, shall initially either agree, or resolve to disagree, on any and all entitlement issues arising out of the pending Motion for an Award of Attorneys Fees/Costs. 292 0 obj endobj << endobj /S /P endobj /K [27] endobj >> >> endobj 110 0 obj 43 0 R 44 0 R 45 0 R 46 0 R 47 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 270 0 R 271 0 R << << >> /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem >> Mr. Burman may be contacted by e-mail at DivParalgl@yahoo.com for more information. /P 322 0 R /K [3] /K [67] /Pg 31 0 R >> /Resources 565 0 R >> /S /P /Type /StructElem /Contents [506 0 R 507 0 R 508 0 R] /P 673 0 R 83 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R Ohio 2003) ("Attorneys fees and costs are matters traditionally reserved for court determination" and "contractual fee-shifting provision for reimbursement [of fees] /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem >> << /K [45] /ActualText (mmiller@millerfirmllc.com) endobj /S /Span /Chart /Sect 209 0 obj << /S /P /Type /StructElem /P 694 0 R >> /Tabs /S /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /AcroForm 4 0 R In any case type that is subject to a filing fee under ORS 21.010, a $53.00 fee must be paid by the party filing any of the motions listed below. endobj 21 0 obj /S /H1 /S /P 217 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem << endobj /P 699 0 R /P 178 0 R >> /S /P /P 633 0 R /K [13] /K [3] /K 11 /Pg 13 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj >> << /Rotate 0 /Type /StructElem /K [13] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K [448 0 R 449 0 R] /Producer <4D6963726F736F6674AE20576F726420323031333B206D6F646966696564207573696E6720695465787420322E312E37206279203154335854> endobj /S /P /P 9 0 R 376 0 obj /S /P /Pg 21 0 R << /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K [7] /S /P /Type /StructElem 461 0 obj >> >> /P 9 0 R 143 0 obj /K 17 /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem endobj 3107 314 0 obj >> /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem 185 0 obj 270 0 obj endobj >> endobj /Pg 27 0 R /K [1] /S /TOC /S /Span /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 14 0 R /P 9 0 R /P 9 0 R /Resources 549 0 R >> /Type /StructElem The Alaska appellate court has reviewed enhanced attorney's fees awards for unreasonableness and bad faith when, for example, claims lacked any evidentiary support, were fraudulent from inception, or were clearly brought with the intent to harass. /ParentTree 10 0 R endobj endobj /S /Span /P 106 0 R >> /P 9 0 R /P 681 0 R /P 194 0 R /Artifact /Sect endobj 10 0 obj /K [2] << >> /Pg 13 0 R /P 194 0 R This is usually done for two reasons: (1) to try to back off the objecting party by creating the risk that its own attorney fees will be discoverable, and (2) to argue to the court that the best evidence of what is reasonable is what the objecting party paid in litigating the same legal and factual issues in the case. /Parent 6 0 R 88 0 obj /ActualText (-) << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 404 0 obj /K [27] /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R /P 36 0 R >> /Filter /FlateDecode 43 0 obj 24 [122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] /S /P /K [24] /Group 477 0 R /K [22] 15 0 obj 294 0 obj /Pg 31 0 R /Tabs /S /Pg 27 0 R /Parent 6 0 R Motion for Attorney's Fees in California - Trellis /S /Span 3 0 obj /P 190 0 R >> /S /P /Type /Page /Type /StructElem 38 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R endobj << /Pg 13 0 R endobj >> /P 9 0 R >> /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 18 0 R /K [34] /Resources 590 0 R /K [9] << >> endobj << Co., 190 So. /S /P Pleading Requirements for a Claim for Attorneys' Fees /S /P << /Type /StructElem 434 0 obj 159 0 obj /S /P << /Type /StructElem Opposition to Motion for Fees and Penalties, filed herewith. /P 9 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem >> /K [15] PDF 13-12466 Moon - Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs From Order on If several defendants share the same attorney, you need only make one copy for that attorney. /Type /StructElem /P 686 0 R endobj /P 39 0 R /S /Span 454 0 obj >> /S /P /K [61] /Type /StructElem /P 9 0 R << << 212 0 obj endobj /Pg 19 0 R 310 0 obj Rf45TrG"9> E)3-"p_a2f:?7 e8sxKL%;yTRu1jN3c3alB2+@bkTK)^UhSK1z.{j@Z /Pg 13 0 R /S /Span /K [44] 215 0 obj >> 129 0 obj /Rotate 0 /Type /StructElem >> << >> /P 9 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /P 233 0 R >> /S /Span /P 9 0 R /P 233 0 R /S /Span endstream /K [0] /S /P >> /P 608 0 R >> 153 0 obj Sample Opposition To Motion For Award Of Attorney's Fees In California Uploaded by: Stan Burman December 2019 PDF Bookmark Download This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. /StructParents 19 14 0 obj << /MarkInfo 2 0 R /P 612 0 R 35 [383 0 R 384 0 R 385 0 R 386 0 R 387 0 R 388 0 R 389 0 R 390 0 R 391 0 R 392 0 R /P 609 0 R 75 0 obj >> endobj /S /Span /Type /StructElem /Pg 31 0 R Other cases similarly holding include Hernandez v. George, 793 F.2d 264, 268 (10th Cir. /K [247 0 R 248 0 R 249 0 R 250 0 R] /Type /StructElem /P 648 0 R << endobj << /Pg 13 0 R /S /Span /S /H2 >> Before pulling the trigger, however, you will want to consider a potential negative ramification of taking that position. /S /Span >> /Type /StructElem endobj /P 665 0 R << Attorneys' fees related to the enforcement of a judgment are generally not reimbursable, unless specifically allowed by law, or the underlying judgment includes an award of attorney's fees (CCP . /Type /StructElem This Court agrees, and reduces the fees outlined above by $2,618. /P 9 0 R /S /P /P 9 0 R >> << 391 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj 1 The excerpts ofPlaintiffs' First Amended Complaint and each Plaintiff's declaration in 2 support ofTRO/OSC reproduced in Defendants' opposition papers, establish only that 3 Plaintiffs have a particularized interest in the FSC Program, a statutory right to notice, and an . endobj endobj /P 634 0 R /Type /StructElem Before pulling the trigger, however, you will want to consider a potential negative ramification of taking that position. >> /Rotate 0 /Pg 13 0 R endobj The opposition should be served by personal service or overnight mail under the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1005. /P 9 0 R << /Type /StructElem /P 188 0 R /S /Span << endobj << /K [6] /K [1] 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R 126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R 132 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode /Pg 13 0 R PDF Memorandum of Costs - saclaw.org /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /P 36 0 R << 179 0 obj endobj endobj endobj endobj >> endobj /K [1] endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem 33 0 obj 39 0 obj /P 605 0 R 375 0 obj /K [47] /Pg 27 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /Type /StructElem << << Plaintiff also objects to miscellaneous fees that do not appear to relate to the instant matter. /Pg 29 0 R << endobj /Type /StructElem /K [2] /P 9 0 R
